Sounds like it's typically been a reactionary, fragmented catch-up strategy that lacks continuity. The new strategy would be more proactive, unified across space (geography) and continuous across time. One less dependent on star-players (candidates) and stronger systemically (organization). To reference Taleb, building an organization th…
Sounds like it's typically been a reactionary, fragmented catch-up strategy that lacks continuity. The new strategy would be more proactive, unified across space (geography) and continuous across time. One less dependent on star-players (candidates) and stronger systemically (organization). To reference Taleb, building an organization that is more anti-fragile, meaning it expects some loss but becomes stronger because of it (vs. a fragile organization that disintegrates after loss).
Sounds like it's typically been a reactionary, fragmented catch-up strategy that lacks continuity. The new strategy would be more proactive, unified across space (geography) and continuous across time. One less dependent on star-players (candidates) and stronger systemically (organization). To reference Taleb, building an organization that is more anti-fragile, meaning it expects some loss but becomes stronger because of it (vs. a fragile organization that disintegrates after loss).
Love the Taleb reference. Spot on.